Distributed peer review enlists more researchers in the process, but some may lack expertise



Summary

Distributed peer review broadens the pool of reviewers beyond traditional journals, potentially accelerating research evaluation and identifying diverse perspectives. However, a key concern is the variability in reviewer expertise. While increased participation is beneficial, ensuring all reviewers possess sufficient knowledge and experience in the specific subject matter is crucial. The potential for unqualified individuals to influence the peer-review process could compromise the quality and reliability of research validation. Implementing mechanisms to assess reviewer qualifications and weighting contributions accordingly becomes paramount in leveraging the benefits of distributed review while mitigating its inherent risks.

Read more…

This post is part of “Science/Immunology News”, Follow for more…!!!